| |
|
|
Utilization Ratio
The Utilization Ratio or "U-Ratio" is a unique and powerful measure found in Tournament-Style play.
Spend a few minutes with this measure and you'll quickly be able to gain extra insights about how effective
you and your rival managers have been at utilizing the wide array of NFL talent available to you.
The better a team's player utilization, the larger their U-Ratio. A U-Ratio of 1.0 is average. By definition,
all managers have a U-Ratio of 1.0 after NFL Week #1. In Week #2, you will see the U-Ratio change.
Below is an example of the math behind the U-Ratio.
Team-A Starters
This manager has craftily used a selection of top tier and medium tier
players, trying to save studs.
|
Week One |
|
Week Two |
| Pos |
Player |
Pts |
|
Pos |
Player |
Pts |
| QB |
Vick |
15 |
|
QB |
Carr |
19 |
| RB |
Bettis |
18 |
|
RB |
Dayne |
10 |
| RB |
Suggs |
19 |
|
RB |
Fargas |
19 |
| WR |
Hilliard |
15 |
|
WR |
Porter |
18 |
| WR |
Rice |
15 |
|
WR |
Branch |
15 |
| WR |
Clayton |
15 |
|
WR |
Calico |
10 |
| TE |
Mili |
15 |
|
TE |
Clark |
10 |
| K |
Mare |
15 |
|
K |
Reed |
9 |
| DEF |
Bears |
13 |
|
DEF |
Colts |
10 |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
120 |
So, in total, this manager has tallied 260 points.
Next, lets assume all the players listed above are all averaging 10 FFTOC Points per Game over the
first two weeks of the season. In other words, if you started these
players on an average week, you would have tallied 90 points a week or
180 total points over the two week season.
Team-A's U-Ratio = 260/180 = 1.44
By looking at the U-Ratio we can quickly see Team-A is getting above
average production out of his starters. In short, this manager is doing
rather well and he's saving studs.
Let's say Team-B also had 260 points. However, Team-B used plenty of
stud players like Holmes, Tomlinson, Manning and Moss. And, lets say all
those studs have been averaging 20 points a game for the season. Given
that, Team-B's U-Ratio would be much lower than Team-A's. This could
indicate that Team-A is better positioned over the coming weeks.
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
|